Crime and Punishment in France


American crime shows are all over French television. “Law and Order,” for example, has long been a staple on various networks here, where it’s called “New York District.” My friend Renaud tells me that it’s been so popular over the years that young offenders who are brought to court sometimes refer to the judge as “Votre honneur,” or your honor, using a translation of the English rather than the proper French address of “Monsieur le Président” or “Monsieur le Juge.”

I know that U.S. and English laws are quite different from French law, of course – though I base my knowledge of this mainly on having watched an excellent French crime series, “Engrenages” (given the title “Spiral” in English-speaking countries). It concerns crime and its aftermath in and around Paris, rather like a grittier French “Law and Order” with much more existential anguish thrown in.

The way in which France deals with crime is surely related to its history. Now, America is in many ways more violent than other countries, including France. And the nature of American violence, or America’s attitude to violence and crime, is a reflection of America’s national character, as much as France’s is to a French national outlook.

France has, in its long history, been occupied more than once by foreign oppressors. The enemy have lived among the French, leading perhaps to an acceptance of a certain level of crime that had become institutionalized by that foreign presence. Following its revolution, France – unlike the U.S. – endured a savage reign of terror. America had its own ravaging Civil War, but religious conflicts through the centuries didn’t tear our country apart as they did France. Such events down the years have doubtless affected not only how the French consider their history but also how they think of violence, of justice or of retribution. Or even the depiction of such things.


In the same way, the French find it difficult to comprehend the size or variety of the United States, with its 50 states, its sometimes-conflicting local and federal laws, its troubled history not only of slavery and reconstruction and lynching and genocidal westward expansion, but its gun culture and its various state methods of capital punishment.

I’ve sometimes been asked to explain to French friends our American ways regarding guns and crime (they think we’re all armed to the teeth), but all I can usually come up with is the French equivalent of, “You have to have been born there,” to begin to understand how different are our attitudes in this regard, even as I assure them I don’t know anyone who carries a gun.

But everyone also has suppositions about violence elsewhere else. My friend Odette once told me during a dinner party that serial killers didn’t exist in France. She insisted that this type of murderer – un tueur en série – was purely an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon. She refused to change her mind even after other French friends contradicted her by naming several notorious French serial killers, such as Joseph Vacher, “The French Ripper” who slaughtered 11 people in the 19th century or, more recently, Claude Lastennet, who in the early 1990s was convicted of killing five old women, one after the other.


“It’s not our tradition,” she said, firmly.

It might not be an American tradition either, but you could probably argue that it’s not exactly un-American, given how often it occurs there, and how often it propels plotlines.

And while I don’t know if a specific kind of killer is native to France, I do believe that France, having had its own particular history of violence, thinks differently – and perhaps with far less sentimentality – about crime, death and even punishment than does America.

Although I can only observe rather than feel France’s ingrained judicial and cultural suppositions regarding criminality, either at the public or personal level, the French relation to crime and justice drew my attention during my first stay here. In those early weeks I saw plastered around Paris lurid yet elegant posters for a big exhibition at the Musée d’Orsay, “Crime et Châtiment,” or crime and punishment.

The show explored crime through art and artifacts from the 18th century to the 20th, mainly in France, but included examples of crime and punishment elsewhere. It had a mix of French classics – David’s “Death of Marat,” for example – and American sensationalism – such as Warhol’s electric-chair silk screens. It also had Goya’s gruesome cannibal paintings, and macabre drawings and charcoals by Victor Hugo. Even a threatening old guillotine that still remained sharp.


But what really drew me (and probably everyone else) were the grisly depictions of real-life violence in all their unnatural gore, especially the sordid you-are-there crime-scene photographs that began to appear in the late 19th and early 20th century, and the four-color, illustrated French weeklies with their front-page emphasis on murder and butchery, with drawings even more grisly than what you might see today in a slasher film. Who can resist the siren call of bloody mayhem?

The studies in phrenology on display were also in their way wonderful, heads of the dead, death masks, paintings, calculations and diagrams meaning to explain those murderous impulses as a result of someone’s physical appearance.

images-12For example, after the execution of Giuseppe Fieschi in 1836 for the attempted regicide of King Louise-Philippe, a mold was made from his head and a portrait done of him freshly dead. Experts in phrenology studied both in order to see how the features of his face and the shape of his cranium might have demonstrated signs of his criminal compulsion. Although this kind of research occurred throughout Europe at the time, it seemed particularly French to me, a post-Enlightenment exploration meant to unlock the secrets of the dangerous wayward mind through an individual’s physical attributes.

Perhaps most surprising was the example of one of the lifelike ballerina statues that Degas had created.

It seems that the young dancer’s head was modeled along the lines of a phrenologist’s specimen of a criminal’s skull. I hadn’t known this, and this fact is not necessary for an appreciation of Degas’ art. But it added a little frisson to the representation of a little girl in a ballet pose. Can we assume anything evil about someone, or something, that appears so unthreatening? Can we make any assumptions about what makes a person commit atrocities? Can we judge a national character by its attitude toward crime or punishment? Maybe, maybe not.

What Degas demonstrated to me, however, was a very French matter-of-factness mixed with a subtle French irony in using something related to the fruitless study of criminality to arrive at the enduring sublime.

2 thoughts on “Crime and Punishment in France

  1. While your last sentence may drive the reader ( me, a perfect French in several ways ) to smell the existence in you of a door/window open to a more subtle perception ( mainly related to the relationship between the subject and the object of our consciousness), I feel the need of expressing some thoughts .
    First this phrenology attempts are not at all specially French . The XIXth century saw “searchers” in Germany, Britain, France, Italy, rather everywhere in Europe . Gobineau played a great part, but they were several .
    Then I can’t let a thinker like you in this English dishonesty product about the first French revolution.: The Terror lasted one year over 10 years ( 89/99) until the bourgeoisie champion, Napo, eventually killed all hopes for an achieved revolution . It’s an English lie to have reduced in the whole Anglo-Saxon consciousness the French Rev. to Terror . All the beauties of human soul have disappeared, and there were a lot in those 10 years . But this deserves more than 2 lines ( from all the books I read about that, Piotr Kropotkine’s “The Great French Revolution” is the most complete, the one who tells you about many more things ) .
    Now there are indeed deep differences in the way how French and Americans relate to crime or justice, but these differences are connected to fundamental differences about everything regarding society and social relations . No need to say that, at individual level, from man to man, these cultural differences don’t weight much, at least when two free minded individuals meet . I’d like to drag your attention to the fact that France has been for long a sort of advanced arrow in the way to revolutions and the quest for social justice on Earth but from the origin has also been a dedicated place to efforts for mysticism . If, if only the Southern half civilisation of the Middle-Age had not been slaughtered by the Northern Barbarians From Paris, London and Germany during the anti-Cathars crusade, the whole world would have followed a different path . This was before the 100 years war, mind you, and long before Luther . It’s also good to know that the first Lodge of the antique esoteric schools coming from Egypt though Greece and Palestine ever founded in the future Europe was in Toulouse, in Charlemagne’s time . Hence, the Catars, the Templars, the Alchemists, the Kabbalah ( of which a good part has been written in Southern france ), the first books about the Holy Graal, etc.
    What I want to transmit is that the relationship the French have always had with politics, justice, churches or crime, is based on a very deep feeling that political, religious, judicial powers are all rather usurped by liars/criminals . When you think there’s fundamentally no justice in your civilisation, your attitude towards illegality is influenced .This feeling is not always clear, and it’s fading quickly since Frenchness is fading, but you need to have a deep view on history to cross the bridge between DC and Toulouse . To achieve your French immersion you need to travel through time as well as through space . After all it’s not more difficult . A last anecdote about one thing I love in French soul : Around 78 I visited an old peasant/woodman in this wide forest where I live, in the wild South-West . This guy had been in the resistance, whose motto was ” From Resistance to Revolution” . He led me to a barn, took a mass of hay away, and showed me an armored car he saved in 44, when de Gaulle AND the Stalinian CP French leader, Thorez, toured around France to exhort resistants to give their weapons to the new authorities rather than achieve the revolution . The old chap showed it to me and said ” I saved it for the next time we’ll need it”, and he didn’t mean next war .


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s